<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak Zx1 First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Technology, mobile, photography, travel and anything else I find interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-63321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-63321</guid>
		<description>Personally I like having a separate device for personal video recording, as all experiences with multi-purpose phones are less than enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I like having a separate device for personal video recording, as all experiences with multi-purpose phones are less than enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-63182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-63182</guid>
		<description>There is a mobile phone that has HD video recording, the Samsung Omnia HD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a mobile phone that has HD video recording, the Samsung Omnia HD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-56680</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-56680</guid>
		<description>Do you know if any configuration is needed in GNU/Linux ?
(p.e. Ubuntu)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if any configuration is needed in GNU/Linux ?<br />
(p.e. Ubuntu)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-48952</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-48952</guid>
		<description>I really want one of these... but does it take regular pictures?  I&#039;ve read many reviews and nothing found that mentioned still capture quality, or provided any samples (or right out stated whether or not it has this function).  I&#039;m sorry if it&#039;s a stupid question, but I really would like to know!

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want one of these&#8230; but does it take regular pictures?  I&#8217;ve read many reviews and nothing found that mentioned still capture quality, or provided any samples (or right out stated whether or not it has this function).  I&#8217;m sorry if it&#8217;s a stupid question, but I really would like to know!</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-48808</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-48808</guid>
		<description>Ryan - the lenses come with metal rings that have thin double sided tape already on them....you just peel and stick. The lens then connects to that ring via the magnet on the lens itself (which is glued onto the back of the lens).

Both a great cameras....it boils down to do you want smaller/weatherproof or do you want a bigger screen/macro option. The lenses will work with either camera. 

As I&#039;ve said before, if I could do it again, I&#039;d buy the Zx1 over the Zi6 simply because of the form factor but that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan &#8211; the lenses come with metal rings that have thin double sided tape already on them&#8230;.you just peel and stick. The lens then connects to that ring via the magnet on the lens itself (which is glued onto the back of the lens).</p>
<p>Both a great cameras&#8230;.it boils down to do you want smaller/weatherproof or do you want a bigger screen/macro option. The lenses will work with either camera. </p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, if I could do it again, I&#8217;d buy the Zx1 over the Zi6 simply because of the form factor but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-48774</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-48774</guid>
		<description>Hey John,
I&#039;ve really enjoyed your posts about using different lenses with the cameras, so thank you :).   Because the face of this device is not magnetic, I am curious as to how difficult it would be to attach a ring to the face as you suggested?  Glue?  Any more theoretical yet specific advice would be helpful.  I am interested in either the Zi6 or the Zx1 but buying the former seems like a bad decision with the big brother present.

Thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,<br />
I&#8217;ve really enjoyed your posts about using different lenses with the cameras, so thank you :).   Because the face of this device is not magnetic, I am curious as to how difficult it would be to attach a ring to the face as you suggested?  Glue?  Any more theoretical yet specific advice would be helpful.  I am interested in either the Zi6 or the Zx1 but buying the former seems like a bad decision with the big brother present.</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-46817</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-46817</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really noticed any difference in the sound between the two cameras...but I haven&#039;t actually done any kind of comparison. It&#039;s been pretty rainy here for the last while but if the sun does come out, I&#039;ll try a shot with both at the sun. The Zx1 has been confirmed by Kodak reps that it is just a repackaged Zi6 as I suspected...I haven&#039;t really noticed anything significant between them from a video quality standpoint. The firmware update on the Zi6 certainly improved things but it&#039;s still not the same firmware as the Zx1 so the eV gain could be one of the differences. It can be hard to tell unless  you view the source clips from the cameras since putting them on the web always introduces some kind of loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really noticed any difference in the sound between the two cameras&#8230;but I haven&#8217;t actually done any kind of comparison. It&#8217;s been pretty rainy here for the last while but if the sun does come out, I&#8217;ll try a shot with both at the sun. The Zx1 has been confirmed by Kodak reps that it is just a repackaged Zi6 as I suspected&#8230;I haven&#8217;t really noticed anything significant between them from a video quality standpoint. The firmware update on the Zi6 certainly improved things but it&#8217;s still not the same firmware as the Zx1 so the eV gain could be one of the differences. It can be hard to tell unless  you view the source clips from the cameras since putting them on the web always introduces some kind of loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: du BoisPerdu</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-46804</link>
		<dc:creator>du BoisPerdu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-46804</guid>
		<description>hi John,
nice site and greatly appreciative of your wide/fisheye tips on vimeo. Real reason I write: have u seen the latest post on vimeo comparison Zi6/Zx1. The sound qual on the Zx1 is noticebly deficient... have you compared the two?  Also, in one shot, the sun saturates the two cams and the the old Zi6 handles this much more successfully. Makes me wonder if they&#039;e just upped the eV gain on the newer model to give the impression the lo-lite performance is better.
Just some thoughts!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi John,<br />
nice site and greatly appreciative of your wide/fisheye tips on vimeo. Real reason I write: have u seen the latest post on vimeo comparison Zi6/Zx1. The sound qual on the Zx1 is noticebly deficient&#8230; have you compared the two?  Also, in one shot, the sun saturates the two cams and the the old Zi6 handles this much more successfully. Makes me wonder if they&#8217;e just upped the eV gain on the newer model to give the impression the lo-lite performance is better.<br />
Just some thoughts!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-45552</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-45552</guid>
		<description>Paul: I think all the videos I&#039;ve shot have been at 60fps....and with the exception of the low light test, all were straight from camera to Youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: I think all the videos I&#8217;ve shot have been at 60fps&#8230;.and with the exception of the low light test, all were straight from camera to Youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2009/03/27/kodak-zx1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-45519</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/?p=1590#comment-45519</guid>
		<description>hi John, i checked again on my linux box and it&#039;s a lot smoother.  so i guess it was just my vista box at work.  were the movies that you uploaded on youtube straight off the camera?  and were you filming in 60 fps or 30 fps?  thanks again for the reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi John, i checked again on my linux box and it&#8217;s a lot smoother.  so i guess it was just my vista box at work.  were the movies that you uploaded on youtube straight off the camera?  and were you filming in 60 fps or 30 fps?  thanks again for the reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

