<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPhone friendly plugin for WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/</link>
	<description>We didn't make the internet, we make it better.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/#comment-5625</guid>
		<description>Agreed about the pinching/zooming thing. Depending on the site I prefer the click navigation vs having to make a giant site fit onto the iPhone's small screen. Also I think plugins like yours are easier on the bandwidth since you're not trying to load the entire site with all it's ajaxy goodness over a substandard wireless data plan.

I also agree that surfing on the iPhone isn't perfect - far from it... but it is a huge leap from where we came from. I remember thinking how awesome Blazer was on my Treo compared to the WAP browser I had used before it. Seems like the stone age now.

As you say, everyone's milage will vary and everyone has their own preference....I'm glad there are at least options now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about the pinching/zooming thing. Depending on the site I prefer the click navigation vs having to make a giant site fit onto the iPhone&#8217;s small screen. Also I think plugins like yours are easier on the bandwidth since you&#8217;re not trying to load the entire site with all it&#8217;s ajaxy goodness over a substandard wireless data plan.</p>
<p>I also agree that surfing on the iPhone isn&#8217;t perfect - far from it&#8230; but it is a huge leap from where we came from. I remember thinking how awesome Blazer was on my Treo compared to the WAP browser I had used before it. Seems like the stone age now.</p>
<p>As you say, everyone&#8217;s milage will vary and everyone has their own preference&#8230;.I&#8217;m glad there are at least options now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Storey</title>
		<link>http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbiehler.com/2008/04/29/new-iphone-friendly-plugin-for-wordpress/#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>Some good comments.  While I'm a big supporter obviously of WPtouch, I definitely see your point, and in a perfect world I think everyone would modify their own CSS and keep their own look and feel.  Unfortunately, very few people have the skills to do that.

And while the iPhone is a great web experience compared to other mobile devices, it is far from perfect -- at the end of the day you're still viewing websites designed for 800x600 or 1024x768 on a device that's a little larger than 300 pixels wide.  That leads to compromises and affects readability -- I for one do not really enjoying panning around the page and using the pinch scrolling just to read a single article.   But everyone's milage will vary, and your points are valid for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good comments.  While I&#8217;m a big supporter obviously of WPtouch, I definitely see your point, and in a perfect world I think everyone would modify their own CSS and keep their own look and feel.  Unfortunately, very few people have the skills to do that.</p>
<p>And while the iPhone is a great web experience compared to other mobile devices, it is far from perfect &#8212; at the end of the day you&#8217;re still viewing websites designed for 800&#215;600 or 1024&#215;768 on a device that&#8217;s a little larger than 300 pixels wide.  That leads to compromises and affects readability &#8212; I for one do not really enjoying panning around the page and using the pinch scrolling just to read a single article.   But everyone&#8217;s milage will vary, and your points are valid for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.409 seconds -->
